CELLPHONES ARE OVER THE RADIATION GUIDELINES SET UP BY THE FCC???

CELLPHONES ARE OVER THE RADIATION GUIDELINES SET UP BY THE FCC???

It has been said and even shown in independent testing that today’s Cellphones are often many times over the safety guidelines for EMF radiation set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).  Testing we paid an independent lab to do also clearly shows cellphones heating people’s heads significantly.   

Below you will find information that we have found on this subject as well as an article from the Chicago Tribune back in 2019 where their own independent testing showed iPhones and many other models well over the safety limits.

But before you read more or find out how today’s phones are likely many times over the 1.6 W/kg of body weight safety limits (set by the FCC), it is super important to first understand how a cellphone’s microwave radiation heats our bodies and heads.  It is very different from that of being heating by a radiator, or something that heats from the outside in.  These heat us from the inside out!  Just like a microwave oven’s radiation, the microwaves which emit from a cellphone also shake and vibrate molecules trillions of times per second, crashing them into each other, creating friction and heat.  It is the opinion of some, or even of many, that heating our bodies or heads to any degree in this fashion is insane.  Any level of heating by microwave EMF radiation sounds terrible to us anyway.

But even if you accept the FCC’s high safety standards of 1.6 W/kg of body weight as acceptable, the big bummer is that your cellphone almost certainly exceeds that and by many times over.  Watch this video to see how a cellphone can heat and how using the right solution can remediate this heat:

VIDEO ABOVE:  Shows heating of a person’s head or lack there of with EMF Solutions’ Cell or iCell Chip

As far back as 2019, others found that even those earlier model cellphones exceeded the safety limits, including the independent study done by the Chicago Tribune.  They tested models like the iPhone 7.  If those models were “unsafe”, just imagine what today’s much stronger 5G phones might be?  Yikes.

So here’s the article from 2019 below.  But important FYI – there were follow up studies and found slightly newer phones, still not today’s models, were up to 5 times the safety limits!  This should not be ignored by those who care about wellness!

But great news.  This is fixable!

 

Aug 21, 2019

Chicago Tribune Article on FCC and EMF radiation safety standards

 

We tested popular cellphones for radiofrequency radiation. Now the FCC is investigating

 

The Apple iPhone 7 was set to operate at full power and secured below a tub of clear liquid, specially formulated to simulate human tissue.

With the push of a button, a robotic arm swung into action, sending a pencil-thin probe dipping into the tub. For 18 minutes, it repeatedly measured the amount of radiofrequency radiation the liquid was absorbing from the cellphone.

This test, which was paid for by the Tribune and conducted according to federal guidelines at an accredited lab, produced a surprising result: Radiofrequency radiation exposure from the iPhone 7 — one of the most popular smartphones ever sold — measured over the legal safety limit and more than double what Apple reported to federal regulators from its own testing.

The Federal Communications Commission, which is responsible for regulating phones, states on its website that if a cellphone has been approved for sale, the device “will never exceed” the maximum allowable exposure limit. But this phone, in an independent lab inspection, had done exactly

 

 

The Tribune tested three more brand-new iPhone 7s at full power, and these phones also measured over the exposure limit. In all, 11 models from four companies were tested, with varying results.

The Tribune’s testing, though limited, represents one of the most comprehensive independent investigations of its kind, and the results raise questions about whether cellphones always meet safety standards set up to protect the public.

After reviewing the lab reports from the Tribune’s tests, the FCC said it would take the rare step of conducting its own testing over the next couple of months.

“We take seriously any claims on non-compliance with the RF (radiofrequency) exposure standards and will be obtaining and testing the subject phones for compliance with FCC rules,” agency spokesman Neil Grace said.

 

The Tribune set out a year ago to explore an important question: Are cellphones as safe as manufacturers and government regulators say?

Though it’s unclear whether radiofrequency radiation from cellphones can increase cancer risk or lead to other harm, that question is increasingly pressing given the widespread use of cellphones today. Many children and teenagers may face years of exposure.

The newspaper’s testing was not meant to rank phone models for safety – only 11 models were examined, and in most cases just one device was tested. Nor is it possible to know whether any of the cellphones that tested above limits could cause harm. Two of the phone manufacturers, including Apple, disputed the Tribune’s results, saying the lab used by the newspaper had not tested the phones the same way they do.

But the results of the Tribune’s investigation contribute to an ongoing debate about the possible risks posed by radiofrequency radiation from cellphones, and they offer evidence that existing federal standards may not be adequate to protect the public.

 

Industry officials and manufacturers emphasize that before a new model can be brought to market, a sample phone must be tested and comply with an exposure standard for radiofrequency radiation. But manufacturers are allowed to select the testing lab — and only a single phone needs to pass in order for millions of others to be sold.

Companies testing a new phone for compliance with the safety limit also are permitted to position the phone up to 25 millimeters away from the body — nearly an inch — depending on how the device is used. That’s because the testing standards were adopted in the 1990s, when people frequently carried cellphones on belt clips.

In one phase of the Tribune testing, all phones were positioned at the same distance from the simulated body tissue that the manufacturers chose for their own tests — from 5 to 15 millimeters, depending on the model. Apple, for instance, tests at 5 millimeters.

But people now often carry phones closer to the body, in their pockets, which increases their potential exposure to radiofrequency radiation.

To assess this kind of exposure, the Tribune asked its lab to conduct a second phase of testing, placing the phones 2 millimeters away from the simulated body — closer than any of the manufacturers’ own tests and far less than the maximum distance allowed by the FCC.

 

 

Article at the Chicago Tribune found at (you have to be a member to read it) -->

We tested popular cellphones for radiofrequency radiation. Now the FCC is investigating.